A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (2024)

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Journals
      • Active Journals
      • Find a Journal
      • Proceedings Series
  • Topics
  • Information
      • For Authors
      • For Reviewers
      • For Editors
      • For Librarians
      • For Publishers
      • For Societies
      • For Conference Organizers
      • Open Access Policy
      • Institutional Open Access Program
      • Special Issues Guidelines
      • Editorial Process
      • Research and Publication Ethics
      • Article Processing Charges
      • Awards
      • Testimonials
  • Author Services
  • Initiatives
  • About
      • Overview
      • Contact
      • Careers
      • News
      • Press
      • Blog

Sign In / Sign Up Submit

Journals

Buildings

Volume 14

Issue 6

10.3390/buildings14061841

Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue

► Article Menu

Article Menu

Article Views
Citations -
  • Table of Contents

announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles

thumb_up ... Endorse textsms ... Comment

Need Help?

Support

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Get Support

Feedback

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Give Feedback

Information

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

Get Information

clear

JSmol Viewer

clear

first_page

settings

Order Article Reprints

Font Type:

Arial Georgia Verdana

Font Size:

Aa Aa Aa

Line Spacing:

Column Width:

Background:

This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.

Article

by

Mistreselasie Abate

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (9)Mistreselasie Abate

1A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (10),

Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (11)Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista

1,*A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (12) and

Vivian W. Y. Tam

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (13)Vivian W. Y. Tam

2

1

School of Engineering, Civil Engineering, Engineering Institute of Technology, Perth, WA 6005, Australia

2

School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia

*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Buildings 2024, 14(6), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Submission received: 13 March 2024 / Revised: 9 May 2024 / Accepted: 12 June 2024 / Published: 17 June 2024

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study on Concrete Structures)

Download PDF

VersionsNotes

Abstract

An earthquake is one of the most significant and shocking natural disasters ever documented anywhere on the planet. Throughout history, it has claimed millions of lives and wreaked devastation on infrastructure. Because earthquake forces are spontaneous and unpredictable, engineering methods must be honed to investigate buildings under the impact of these forces. The dynamic and static computations of four RC multistory structure prototypes with various elevations in a high seismic zone are compared in this paper. The project under review is modeled as a 3, 6, 12, and 18-story establishment, and it is analyzed employing ETABS vs. 2019. The Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) Procedure is used for static experimentation, while the Response Spectrum (RS) Procedure is employed for dynamic investigation. Both calculations are performed as per the EUROCODE 8-2004 recommendation. The ELF seismic load practice utilized was for the country of Norway, which has similar parameters to the ES-EN 8-15 seismic regulation Type I target RS, with ag/g = 0.1, spectrum type = I, soil factor S = 1.3 ground type, spectrum period (Tb, Tc, and Td) 0.1 s, 0.25 s, and 1.5 s. For the RS investigation, the parameters employed are as per ESEN-2015, ag/g = 0.1, and the spectrum type = I and ground type = B parameters were involved in the same manner for the RS analysis. The soil factor was set to 1.35; the spectrum period was set to (Tb, Tc, and Td) 0.05 s, 0.25 s, and 1.2 s. The behavior factor = 3.8, the lower bound factor = 0.2, and the damping ratio = 0.05. The results are then compared by employing different components such as displacement, story drift, story stiffness, base story shear, and story moment. Ultimately, a comparison of static and dynamic investigations has been carried out. Compared to the RS approach, the ELF technique produces more additional displacement, total drift, and base shear. As per the findings of this paper, for high-rise and tall buildings, dynamic analysis such as RS should be used rather than static analysis (ELF).

Keywords: base shear; equivalent lateral force; story drift; response spectrum; displacement; static analysis; dynamic analysis; linear analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abate, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J.; Tam, V.W.Y. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings 2024, 14, 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

AMA Style

Abate M, Evangelista ACJ, Tam VWY. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings. 2024; 14(6):1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abate, Mistreselasie, Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista, and Vivian W. Y. Tam. 2024. "A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code" Buildings 14, no. 6: 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Cite

Export citation file: BibTeX | EndNote | RIS

MDPI and ACS Style

Abate, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J.; Tam, V.W.Y. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings 2024, 14, 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

AMA Style

Abate M, Evangelista ACJ, Tam VWY. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings. 2024; 14(6):1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abate, Mistreselasie, Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista, and Vivian W. Y. Tam. 2024. "A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code" Buildings 14, no. 6: 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

clear

Buildings, EISSN 2075-5309, Published by MDPI

RSS Content Alert

Further Information

Article Processing Charges Pay an Invoice Open Access Policy Contact MDPI Jobs at MDPI

Guidelines

For Authors For Reviewers For Editors For Librarians For Publishers For Societies For Conference Organizers

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (14)

© 1996-2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (2024)

FAQs

What is seismic analysis of building structures? ›

Seismic analysis is a branch of structural analysis that involves calculating a building's (or nonbuilding's) earthquake reaction. In earthquake-prone areas, it is an element of the structural design, earthquake engineering, or structural evaluation and retrofit (also structural engineering).

What is seismic analysis of existing buildings? ›

The evaluation of the seismic resistance of existing structures and their deficiencies is essential before an appropriate repair or upgrade system can be designed. The performance of the structure may be evaluated in terms of its lateral load resistance, global or interstory drift and potential damage.

What are the seismic analysis methods for irregular buildings? ›

The methods for analysing irregular structures under the seismic loads are static methods such as equivalent lateral force method and pushover analysis, and dynamic methods such as Response Spectrum Analysis and Time History Method.

What is evaluation for seismic performance of buildings? ›

The criteria of evaluation of building will depend on materials, strength and ductility of structural components and detailing of reinforcement. Visual inspection is an integral part of evaluation, and in fact, is the most widely used form of non-destructive evaluation (NDE).

What is the seismic rating of a building? ›

SPC ratings range from 1 to 5 with SPC 1 assigned to buildings that may be at risk of collapse during a strong earthquake and SPC 5 assigned to buildings reasonably capable of providing services to the public following a strong earthquake.

What are seismic methods of analysis? ›

To apply seismic loads in finite element analysis, the large mass method (LMM) was adopted. This method is used generally when the ground is affected by acceleration to analyze the dynamic behavior of the structure that is fixed to the ground. In the LMM, an appropriate ground mass must be determined.

What is seismic reliability analysis of structures? ›

The classic approach for computing seismic reliability of a structural system requires a seismic hazard curve and a fragility function and leads to the estimation of the failure probability of the investigated damage state.

What are seismic safe buildings? ›

Base isolation involves constructing a building on top of flexible steel, rubber and lead pads. When the base moves during an earthquake, the isolators vibrate while the structure remains steady. This effectively helps to absorb seismic waves and prevent them from traveling through the building.

What are the two techniques used to test anti seismic buildings? ›

There are currently two comple- mentary experimental techniques to simulate the effect of an earthquake on a structure: one based on the shak- ing table and the other on the reaction wall and strong floor system (see image on page 56).

What is seismic analysis in FEA? ›

Seismic analysis in FEA is predominantly used in civil engineering to evaluate a building's response to an earthquake and the oscillations from it.

What is the objective of seismic analysis of building? ›

Seismic analysis involves evaluating how a structure responds to earthquake-induced forces. This process helps engineers understand potential stress points and the overall behavior of a building during seismic events.

What are the characteristics of seismic performance of the building? ›

It mainly includes four aspects: the seismic fortification level, building the performance level, the structural seismic performance target, and the design method to achieve the structural seismic performance target.

What is a probabilistic seismic analysis? ›

The goal of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is to quantify the rate (or probability) of exceeding various ground-motion levels at a site (or a map of sites) given all possible earthquakes.

What is seismic in construction? ›

Seismic design is a vital process of structural analysis while designing a building, which is subjected to Earthquake ground motions, such that the facility continues to function and serve its purpose even after an Earthquake.

What is seismic structure interpretation? ›

The seismic structure interpretation is realized using quantitative and qualitative descriptions based on the seismic processing results.

What is seismic loads in structural analysis? ›

Seismic loading is one of the basic concepts of earthquake engineering which means application of a seismic oscillation to a structure. It happens at contact surfaces of a structure either with the ground or with adjacent structures.

Top Articles
Hannah Owo Age: Know Her Height, Boyfriend, Net Worth & Family
Hannah Owo: A Comprehensive Insight into Her Journey, Controversies, and Personal Growth
San Angelo, Texas: eine Oase für Kunstliebhaber
Joliet Patch Arrests Today
Enrique Espinosa Melendez Obituary
Activities and Experiments to Explore Photosynthesis in the Classroom - Project Learning Tree
2024 Fantasy Baseball: Week 10 trade values chart and rest-of-season rankings for H2H and Rotisserie leagues
Bellinghamcraigslist
Atrium Shift Select
Best Restaurants In Seaside Heights Nj
Day Octopus | Hawaii Marine Life
Rapv Springfield Ma
Readyset Ochsner.org
Binghamton Ny Cars Craigslist
Walthampatch
10 Best Places to Go and Things to Know for a Trip to the Hickory M...
Tcgplayer Store
Las 12 mejores subastas de carros en Los Ángeles, California - Gossip Vehiculos
Vrachtwagens in Nederland kopen - gebruikt en nieuw - TrucksNL
50 Shades Of Grey Movie 123Movies
Pokemon Unbound Shiny Stone Location
Craigslist Pearl Ms
The Weather Channel Local Weather Forecast
Bennington County Criminal Court Calendar
The Creator Showtimes Near R/C Gateway Theater 8
Preggophili
Watson 853 White Oval
Horses For Sale In Tn Craigslist
Pacman Video Guatemala
Buhl Park Summer Concert Series 2023 Schedule
Log in to your MyChart account
Kleinerer: in Sinntal | markt.de
Sinai Sdn 2023
Swimgs Yuzzle Wuzzle Yups Wits Sadie Plant Tune 3 Tabs Winnie The Pooh Halloween Bob The Builder Christmas Autumns Cow Dog Pig Tim Cook’s Birthday Buff Work It Out Wombats Pineview Playtime Chronicles Day Of The Dead The Alpha Baa Baa Twinkle
Renfield Showtimes Near Marquee Cinemas - Wakefield 12
The Ultimate Guide to Obtaining Bark in Conan Exiles: Tips and Tricks for the Best Results
P3P Orthrus With Dodge Slash
What Is Xfinity and How Is It Different from Comcast?
Hair Love Salon Bradley Beach
Solemn Behavior Antonym
The Blackening Showtimes Near Regal Edwards Santa Maria & Rpx
Hindilinks4U Bollywood Action Movies
Bianca Belair: Age, Husband, Height & More To Know
18 terrible things that happened on Friday the 13th
The Listings Project New York
Lesson 5 Homework 4.5 Answer Key
Heat Wave and Summer Temperature Data for Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Concentrix + Webhelp devient Concentrix
Call2Recycle Sites At The Home Depot
Game Akin To Bingo Nyt
Att Corporate Store Location
La Fitness Oxford Valley Class Schedule
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tish Haag

Last Updated:

Views: 5598

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tish Haag

Birthday: 1999-11-18

Address: 30256 Tara Expressway, Kutchburgh, VT 92892-0078

Phone: +4215847628708

Job: Internal Consulting Engineer

Hobby: Roller skating, Roller skating, Kayaking, Flying, Graffiti, Ghost hunting, scrapbook

Introduction: My name is Tish Haag, I am a excited, delightful, curious, beautiful, agreeable, enchanting, fancy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.